Friday, December 30, 2016

Film Review- "Sing"

Sing
Directed by Garth Jennings
Starring Matthew McConaughey, Reese Witherspoon, and Scarlett Johansson

Outside of the original Despicable Me, the films of Illumination Entertainment haven't had a lasting impact on me. The second Despicable film was good but never matched the original, and the Minions spinoff bored me. The Lorax got too preachy instead of celebrating its source material, I never saw Hop or The Secret Life of Pets, the former's trailers didn't wow and the latter appears just to be Toy Story with pets. Then Sing came along with its flashy trailers, selling a delightful animated musical like something right out of the nineties. Those trailers were enough to get me into the theaters this past weekend, and did Sing deliver? Well, for the most part.

Koala Buster Moone (McConaughey) has always loved musical theatre since his father took him to his first show as a child. Now the owner of his own theatre, Buster's facing financial woes, with the threat of the bank seizing control of his assets. After a long string of flops, Buster now thinks he's got the show to save his theatre: A singing competition open to the public.

Some of the selected contestants include Johnny (Taron Edgerton), a gorilla reluctant to be a part of his criminal father's gang, Rosita (Witherspoon) a pig who's an overworked stay-at-home mom, and Ash (Johansson) a porcupine reduced to background vocals by her singing partner/lousy boyfriend. They and the other contestants all have something standing in their way of the spotlight, while Buster scrambles to make sure the show is a guaranteed success and his theatre is saved.

First off, if a musical about a bunch of anthromorphic animals trying to make it in show business sounds familiar, it is. Sing shares a lot of similarities to the forgotten gem of 1991, Cats Don't Dance (and if you haven't seen that I recommend it). Hell both the second act of each film bizarrely ends the same way. But without going into spoilers, Sing's storyline is pretty predictable. It's nothing we haven't seen before in movies.

All the contestants' story lines have been done before. Johnny? The one reluctant to follow a dream because of the disapproval of a parent. Rosita? The one letting their domestic life prevent them from following a dream. Meena the elephant (Tori Kelly)? She has to gain some confidence and overcome stage fright for everyone to see her real talent. Honestly how many times in a musical has a significant other squandered the talent of a character like Ash? There's even a subplot for Buster with the old "liar revealed" cliche' where there's a misunderstanding about the amount of prize money, but it goes nowhere and adds nothing to the film's plot.

Devil's advocate here: Just because the script isn't original, doesn't mean it's not written well. All the characters are still likable and you want to see them succeed. Sing is also one of those musicals where all the songs are just covers of already existing songs, with the exception of one original song in the film sung by Johansson's Ash and another in the end credits. The covers are pretty good though, and the songs they choose match the characters pretty well.

Whoever casted this thing must have gone to the Dreamworks Animation/Blue Sky Studios School of Animated Film Casting, meaning even the smallest of parts are voiced by big celebrities. Seriously, you know all the major players from the trailers, but did you know the likes of Nick Offerman, Leslie Jones, and Jennifer Hudson were also in this?? Me neither until the end credits, but I think it's a testament to their performances. I mean it's nice to see Leslie Jones not screaming and doing her usual schtick, or Nick Offerman not delivering his Ron Swanson dry wit once in awhile. But still, if you're going to have these character actors in small incidental roles, why have them at all?

Tori Kelly as is the true powerhouse of pipes in this musical's ensemble as Meena, who's got an incredible voice. Seth MacFarlane as Mike the mouse (Wait a minute. Mike…Mikey…Mick-I swear to God Illumination…) is doing all of his usual, from his Rat Pack (That's not a pun) style of singing to his typical albeit censored humor. Taron Edgerton gives a lot of heart to Johnny, and who knew he could sing so well? Personally he sings my favorite song in the film. Reese Witherspoon fits Rosita well, and we already knew she could sing. Nick Kroll plays her partner Gunter, who isn't as funny as he should have been. McConaughey, ironically the star of the film, doesn't sing, and I really wanted to know what his singing is like. Anyway he gives plenty of emotion and charisma to Buster.

So Sing isn't an original or groundbreaking film, but it's entertaining enough thanks to its likable characters and good music. Sometimes a film doesn't have to be original or groundbreaking, sometimes we just need something to hold us over for two hours. But is Sing your best animated option for that? No probably not, but I don't regret seeing it, and I enjoyed it enough. If time allows it, I might give it an encore performance.








Wednesday, December 28, 2016

Disney Sequel Showdown: "Beauty & The Beast: The Enchanted Christmas"

Disney Sequel Showdown: Round #4

Beauty & The Beast: The Enchanted Christmas
Directed by Andy Knight
Starring Paige O'Hara, Robby Benson, and Tim Curry

Well Christmas is over but it doesn't mean the glad tidings of the season have to stop! So long as you keep the Christmas cheer in your hearts, and the DVDs of your favorite Christmas specials at the ready! Everyone's got their favorites, from Elf to The Grinch and Santa Claus Is Comin' Town, and if Beauty & The Beast: The Enchanted Christmas is one of your favorites…why?

During a recent stint of Christmas shopping I came across this Disney direct-to-video sequel of old on DVD for ten bucks, and impulsively purchased. I hadn't seen this thing in a decade or so. You might say nostalgia combined with a decent price led me to buying it. Well as Christmas came to a close I sat down to watch it, and sadly this is not one of the better Disney sequels. Is it downright horrible? Not "entirely".

Also spoilers ahead. Do you care? Probably not. It's a Disney sequel from 1996.

The film is told primarily in flashback, and tells us how Belle (O'Hara) brought Christmas back to the castle, much to The Beast's (Benson) disapproval. The Beast hates Christmas. Why? Well it turns out the night he, his castle, and his servants were cursed was in fact, Christmas Eve. That's…neat? Jury's still out on the value of that twist.

Also I find the timeline of this film to be incredibly flimsy. Like it's supposed to take place after the wolf attack in the original but then where does it fit in? Before the library scene? No, because that's supposed to happen like a day after the wolf attack and he wouldn't wait like a week to give her the library. Before "Something There"? I mean that would make sense if it weren't for the fact that by that point in the original they were starting to get along and The Beast is a total dick here. Ugh, I'm getting ahead of myself.

Well it turns out that there's a villainous pipe organ named Maestro Forte (Curry), who used to be the castle's composer before the enchantment. Before the enchantment, The Beast had no use for Forte, and now The Beast uses his gloomy instrumentals as a source of comfort. So Forte likes this new sense of purpose and refuses to let Belle and The Beast fall in love and brake the spell. So he manipulates events through the workings of a piccolo named Fife (Paul Reubens. Paul Reubens is in a Beauty & The Beast film. That's wrong.) hoping to derail Belle's Christmas plans and have the castle remain enchanted forever.

Alright well to expand further on that "Beast is a dick" comment, someone pretty much hit the reset button on character development here.  Belle and The Beast's whole dynamic is wrong. The Beast is supposed to be changing by this point so Belle can learn to like him. Here, Belle is like his super-optimistic girlfriend trying to get him out of his emo funk. The Beast wasn't a dating project for Belle to work on. She was his prisoner for God's sake, and yes while she did make the best of a bad situation, she still missed her father and her old life.

Okay and then at a critical point in the film Belle leaves the castle grounds to go find a Christmas tree, and things get life-threatening. Beast finds her, rescues her…and then locks her in the tower for braking her promise to not leave. But she already broke that word when she ran into the wolves! And arguably at that point The Beast was probably being even less of a dick! So why does "running away from you being a dick" not equal imprisonment but "trying to make sure you have a Merry Christmas" does??

Now Im starting to get into nitpick territory but Forte, his ability to make music, it like, creates magic energy or projections? That he uses during his song (Yeah of course Tim Curry has a song) and the climax of the film. Okay, where's the logic in that? The Enchantress was just whipping up her spell and was like "Hmm, give the composer-turned-pipe organ magic powers." Well then why didn't she give Lumiere fire powers, or Cogsworth the ability to manipulate time and space?? I know this is a Disney movie and magic can run willy nilly, but in the first Beauty & The Beast it was established that these people just got transformed. No more. No less.

The songs in the film, are pretty bland, both on the sides of lyrics and music, although Tim Curry's song is pretty enjoyable. There's a song about Lumiere and Cogsworth's friendship, and it's catchy enough, but why is it here? It adds nothing to the film. There's no subplot about them. My guess it was left out of the original or the Broadway show and they shoehorned it in here. Animation is an obvious downgrade but it's nice given direct-to-video standards and the time it was made.

It's nice to get all the original voice cast back and they're all still giving it their best (despite the material…). Tim Curry is his usual enjoyable self as Forte, and I like the twist in his character wanting to remain enchanted. Paul Reubens as Fife is okay. Bernadette Peters features as the castle decorator turned into a Christmas tree angel, which is clever and she does a nice job. But…going back to nitpicking here!

We meet her in the attic with a bunch of other Christmas decorations. Look at an average Christmas tree, there's probably 30-40 ornaments up there. Now a tree by royalty standards? Probably hundreds. Who were all these people that they became ornaments??? What was their position in the castle that they got a special, seasonal curse? The Castle's Christmas Planning Committee?? And does this mean there's a bunch of poor bastards stuck in the attic transformed as Halloween decorations? Sorry I'm nitpicking I know, because in "Be Our Guest" we saw like hundreds of plates, glasses, etc. but it makes sense there would be all those! People will argue with me about this but oh well.

Beauty & The Beast: The Enchanted Christmas works in a way that passable fan-fiction works. It's not poorly made…if you don't mind forsaking character development and decent songs. Another rewrite or two and this could have been a worthy successor…by direct-to-video standards. If this is one of your favorite Christmas specials, then I won't take that away from you. It's not a disgrace and it's not unwatchable, there's some good intentions here. If it isn't or if you haven't seen it, strictly stick to the original (It's my favorite Disney film and my favorite film of all time), and pay attention to far better Christmas specials. Personally, this will probably remain at the bottom of my Christmas DVD collection. Happy Holidays.



Tuesday, December 27, 2016

Film Review- "Rogue One: A Star Wars Story"

Rogue One: A Star Wars Story
Directed by Gareth Edwards
Starring Felicity Jones, Diego Luna, and Ben Mendelson

We are now living in a reality where there will be a new Star Wars film every year. What a time to be alive. Though instead of just an "Episode" every year and plowing through trilogies, Disney and Lucasfilm are planning to sprinkle spin-off films or "Star Wars Stories" throughout the calendar. The first of these being Rogue One, and it has indeed set the bar for future Star Wars spin-offs.

Set many years after Revenge of the Sith, and shortly before A New Hope ("Ahhh! Prequel territory, run!!" Quiet you.) Rogue One centers on Jyn Erso (Jones), an anti-Empire street criminal who is rescued and recruited by the Rebels. It is revealed her father Galen (Mads Mikkelsen), who was taken to work for the Empire against his will when she was a child, has sent a holographic message to Rebel extremist Saw Gerrera (Forrest Whitaker). Due to her family ties, Jyn is sent with Captain Cassain Andor (Luna) and reprogrammed Imperial droid K-2SO (Alan Tudyk) to retrieve the message. What's in the message? A way to defeat the Empire's unfinished super weapon, the Death Star…

What follows are Jyn and the Rebels' attempts to steal the plans for the Death Star and gain a much needed edge over the Empire, personified here by Death Star Project Director (That's probably not his actual title but I'm calling him that) Orson Krennic (Mendelson) and the ever-looming presence of Darth Vader (James Earl Jones).

 Rogue One manages to craft a compelling and exciting story around a piece of the Star Wars timeline not many probably gave a second thought to. Most of that is credited to its wonderful cast of characters. This is a uniquely diverse and delightfully entertaining ensemble and it's a treat to go on this adventure with them. While most of us can predict how this is all going to go, you still care about these characters and want to see them to succeed. The final act of the film is an amazing ride that will keep you on the edge of your seat until the credits roll.

On the flip side of things, I did find the film's storyline lagged in parts. Some sequences were a little too slow and didn't get us very far. Additionally, as much as I loved these characters and I do feel we got just enough character development for them, I wanted so much more. I wanted to see them bond and interact more, because they're such wonderful characters. Hopefully by one way or another we will see these Rebels again.

Enough about the characters, how about the actors who play them? Felicity Jones as Jyn is obviously the center of the film, and she plays her perfectly with the right balance of gruff and heart. Diego Luna as Captain Andor does a fine job but is more often than not outshined by his co-stars. One of those co-stars being Alan Tudyk as K-2SO, who is a real scene stealer. Donnie Yen and Jiang Wen make a delightfully awesome pair as best friends/Rebel warriors Chirrut Imwe and Baze Malbus.

Ben Mendelson as our villain Director Krennic, is sadly a weak villain. Mendelson plays him well enough, but he's merely just an Empire officer desperate to rise through the ranks and please Darth Vader. Speaking of Darth Vader, this is the most terrifying he's ever been on film. He's used sparingly throughout the film, but when he's used it's incredibly effective.

Couple more notes. The film is beautiful. Stunning visuals and cutting-edge effects bring the Star Wars locations of old to life in a glorious new way, and the battle scenes are incredible to watch. There are plenty of cameos and Easter Eggs to please the fans out there so keep your eyes open. More on that, and being cryptic to avoid spoilers, two characters from the original trilogy are brought back for a significant amount of the film through the use of Industrial Light & Magic's digital technology. It's both eerie and amazing to see what they've done, and hard to talk about without seeing the film, but oh boy is it cool. Lastly, while Star Wars films usually have such iconic music, Michael Giacchino's score is somewhat forgettable, which is sad given his recent eargasmic work in Doctor Strange.

So Rogue One is not a perfect film, but it's incredibly well-made and incredibly entertaining. It's a film all Star Wars fans should love for years to come. If all Star Wars Stories are to be like this, then I think it's fair to say, it's a great time to be a Star Wars fan.



Also, if you'd like to see what some fans thought going into the film opening night, check out this piece I did for Burlington Cable Access TV (BCAT).




Sunday, November 27, 2016

Film Review- "Moana"

"Oh man here we go. Chris is going to blindly fangirl all about the new Disney film regardless of how good or bad it really is."

Hey….shut up…and that's exactly what I'm going to do because Moana is awesome.

Moana
Directed by John Musker & Ron Celements
Starring Auli'i Cravalho and Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson

Let me just say how nice it is to be in the period we're calling The Disney Revival. For the unitiated that's the string of films that began in 2009 with The Princess & The Frog and continues up to the present day. The Mouse's animated output hasn't been this consistent in quality since the Disney Renaissance in the nineties, and if you still don't know what I'm talking about consult this. Point I'm trying to make here, is that there was no doubt that Moana would deliver, and deliver it did.

The film opens by flash-backing to a time when the goddess Te Fiti created life and rose multiple islands to the surface of the ocean. Once her work was complete she too became an island. Shortly afterward the shape-shifting demigod Maui (Johnson), stole her heart and source of power, a ponamu stone. Shortly after that, Maui loses the heart and his magical fish hook in a battle with the lava monster Te Ka, cursing the world for thousands of years to come.

Back to present day, and Moana (Cravalho), the daughter of the chief on the island of Motunui, discovers the ponamu stone, and learns from her grandmother (Rachel House) the ocean has chosen her to return the heart of Te Fiti and bring peace back to the world. Against her father's wishes, Moana leaves her island home to find Maui and get his assistance in returning the heart, and therefore save the world.

The story of Moana is simple in structure, but rich in themes of identity, heritage, and self-worth. You can surely draw parallels between Moana and fellow Disney princesses (She dreams of more, and while a certain little mermaid wants to go on land and her father wants her to stay in the sea, Moana wants to go into the sea and her father wants to stay on land. Man, imagine the fan-fictions.). Nevertheless, Moana is a well-developed character. She wants to do right by her family, but she can't shake the desire to forge her own path, and she struggles to define who she really is. In turn Maui is another well developed Disney lead. On the surface he may seem like he's there for just comic relief, but he's an undoubtedfly flawed, three-dimensional character who also has his own issues of identity to work with.

Together these two characters work together so well, creating another dynamic Disney duo, that build off and strengthen one another throughout the film. Their voice actors, the newcomer Cravalho and everybody's favorite superstar The Rock bring these characters to life and have great chemistry. Cravalho is a true tour de force as Moana, and her performance is the foundation of the entire film. The Rock surprisingly gives a truly heartfelt performance, with his typical charm and humor as Maui. The rest of this voice cast you're not likely to recognize, but each actor embodies his or her character perfectly. Special props go to Rachel House as Moana's grandmother Tala, and Alan Tudyk as Hei Hei.

That's right. That's Alan Tudyk clucking away as that chicken. Give the man an Oscar…by the way how come the animal sidekicks don't talk or have their own songs in Disney films anymore? I miss it…

Speaking of songs, they're unbelievably catchy, crafted by Opetaia Foa'i and Hamilton himself, Lin Manuel Miranda. Each piece is a perfect blend of beautiful and bouncy. Cravalho, only sixteen years old, endures pure awe and chills in many of Moana's songs. Guys, The Rock can sing!! He's only got one number in the film but he nails it. Also, Jermaine Clement of Flight of The Concords shows up for a very interesting song as Tamatoa, a giant crab monster.

The animation in Moana is gorgeous. The setting of South Pacific islands, combined with the story's magical elements, give way for some truly breathtaking visuals, making Moana a real masterpiece of a feast (masterfeast?) for the eyes. You can clearly see that the technology has improved in the short time between Frozen and now.

Moana will rightfully takes its place in the parthenon of Disney animated classics. Wonderful characters, catchy songs, and beautiful animation are the ingredients for another Disney winner, that should get all the repeat viewings in the years to come.

...I feel like I should touch more on the concept of Disney Animation Eras. Sometimes The Package Feature Era is called The War-Time Era, because while they are all package features, that's all they could afford to make because the majority of the studios funding was directed towards making World War II related features, so you know either is appropriate. Also, sometimes The Dark Age is clumped in with The Bronze Age because really, is anyone from Disney really going to call a period of the company "The Dark Age"?

…I should quit while I'm ahead…




Film Review- "Doctor Strange"

Doctor Strange
Directed by Scott Derrickson
Starring Benedict Cumberbatch, Chiwetel Ejiofor, and Tilda Swinton

The fourteenth film of the Marvel Cinematic Universe has been in theaters for almost a month now. After seeing Doctor Strange multiple times in theaters, as much as I enjoy and love it, I do find it could have been a better product.

Stephen Strange (Cumberbatch) is an accomplished yet arrogant neurosurgeon, who ends up in a terrible car accident, rendering his hands practically useless. After modern medicine fails him again and again, he seeks out the secret compound of Kamar-Taj for other methods of healing. There he learns of things such as multi-dimensions, the astral plane and, in layman's terms, sorcery.

Strange begins to learns the ways of the mystic arts under the guidance of The Ancient One (Swinton) and fellow sorcerer Mordo (Ejiofor). As Strange continues his teachings, the vindictive sorcerer Kaecilius (Mads Mikkelsen) and his army of zealots put into motion a plan to sacrifice the world to the being Dormammu and his dark dimension.

It's easy to compare Strange's origin and character to that of Tony Stark/Iron Man. An arrogant know-it-all goes through something traumatic, is given extraordinary gifts and learns humility, just as a large evil threat-in-the-sky looms overhead. Without giving too much away, I personally saw a bit of parallels between the story of this film and the one of the first Thor film. There's nothing special about Doctor Strange's origin story at the base level, but it's the characters unique setting and abilities that elevate it.

The idea of magic and multiple dimensions is something new to the Marvel Cinematic Universe, and the film spectaulrly skyrockets the franchise into this new territory, displaying some truly amazing effects and set pieces for these characters to muck about through. Michael Giacchino's epic score only helps to bring the film's unique tone and aura to life.

Speaking of characters, this cast might be one of the finest Marvel's ever assembled. Benedict Cumberbatch of course is pure gold as the titular character. A fan favorite since we knew this film would happen, he embodies every aspect of the character, and brings both the proper amount of gravitas and sincerity. Chiwetel Ejiofor gives a biblical fierceness to Mordo, that was a highlight of the film for me. Tilda Swinton is both strong and sweet as The Ancient One. Benedict Wong as...Wong, is a hell of a scene stealer. Mads Mikkelsen, while he does a fine job, is another underdeveloped Marvel villain. Rachel McAdams, while she does a fine job, is another underdeveloped Marvel love interest.

This is where I transition into my problems with the film, and it's not just with McAdams and Mikkelsen. While I can praise the performances of the supporting cast, the background and character development left to them in the script is a lot to be desired. McAdams as Christine Palmer is more a plot device then a character and is one of Marvel's weakest leading ladies. We're given two lines of exposition about Kaecilius's backstory, and they're so cryptic we're left to our imagination to figure out where it all went south with him. It's hinted a few times that Mordo's got a dark background of his own (Those of you comic fans know Mordo is one of Doctor Strange's biggest villains), but we learn literally nothing. "You've no idea...the things I've done" he states in the film, and we're left to reply "You're right. We really don't." I understand that this is Strange's origin story, but if these characters are to be a part of his reigon of the MCU, they need to be as well developed as he is. One can only hope that in the inevitable sequel these characters will get their dues.

Is this my first sign of superhero film fatigue? Fourteen films into this franchise, are the patterns all too clear for me now I can't just turn a blind eye, or am I simply doubting the nerd path I've chosen? No of course not, I'm being dramatic. But the problems in Doctor Strange are problems other MCU films that have come before it have had, and I like many, hope to see these problems rectified going forward. Yes the plot of Doctor Strange is a familiar formula, but it's a winning formula and Marvel manages to give it a distinct mold every turn.

So do I consider Doctor Strange a perfect film? No. Do I still love it, consider it one of Marvel's best, and is it one of my favorite Marvel origin stories since Captain America: The First Avenger? Yes. Will it probably be on my Top 10 of the year, even though Captain America: Civil War will be on there too, and will you all roll your eyes at me for being so predictable? More than likely, but haters gonna hate. Complete with stunning visuals, a tremendous cast and beautiful music, stapled in with the usual tropes and formulas, Doctor Strange is a magnificent addition to the Marvel Cinematic Universe. It's pure magic.


Tuesday, August 30, 2016

Film Review- "Sausage Party"

There are moments in every filmgoer's life, when he finds himself sitting in the theater, staring up at the big silver screen. His eye's wide open like a deer in headlights, paralyzed with shock at what he's witnessing, but cannot look away. His jaw hangs open, as his hand muffles the only words that can escape his breathe, "What. The. *Bleep*"

...This is my review of Sausage Party.


Sausage Party
Directed by Greg Tiernan and Conrad Vernon
Starring Seth Rogen, Kristen Wiig, and Nick Kroll

You know me. You know I love Disney and Pixar, but really I'm a sucker for any good animated film. For the longest time, I had wanted someone to come along and give audiences a send up of the genre. For someone to push the boundaries of the art form, and show that "animated" isn't a synonym for "kiddie". A raunchy, satirical, and adult-oriented animated film...Be careful what you wish for kids. Especially when Seth Rogen is the one granting those wishes.

Sausage Party takes place in the world of an average supermarket, where the edible inhabitants have always believed that when they are purchased, they are being chosen by the gods (humans) to leave the store and enter The Great Beyond, i.e. Their heaven.

For a sausage named Frank (Rogen) and a bun named Brenda (Wiig), entering The Great Beyond means them getting to...consummate their love. When they're chosen together, a series of unfortunate events leads Frank to question their entire existence. He goes on a quest to discover the truth about food, even if it means costing him the love of Brenda and the respect of the entire food community.

Sausage Party's greatest strength is its shock value, and my god do I mean shock. You will constantly be in awe with what you're witnessing. From the opening song to the very end you're on a roller coaster of cringe and crude humor, and at the end of that roller coaster is...you have to see it to believe it my friends...

The film's humor can basically fall into two categories: food puns, and sex jokes. This is probably not everybody's cup of tea. Personally, I was laughing quite a bit throughout. Partially because the jokes were clever and funny, mostly because I was in disbelief at the balls they had to took to make this film.

Hidden behind all this obscenity, is actually a clever story that commentates on religion, belief, and individuality. Who would of thought? Seth Rogen & Evan Goldberg have proved before they can be as clever as they can be crude. Unfortunately, you might forget that when you're witnessing a lesbian taco shell voiced by Salma Hayek fight lustful urges to get it on with Kristen Wiig's bun character.

At this point, pretty much everyone in this film has already lent their voice to an animated film, and everyone does a fine job. Ironically, Frank is probably the most three-dimensional character Rogen's ever played in an animated film (That's not a pun on the CGI animation I swear.). Michael Cera does a nice job as Barry, a deformed sausage. Nick Kroll as the film's villain, plays a perfect douche...ok that one was a pun. Most of the voice cast is almost unrecognizable, from Edward Norton doing a Woody Allen impression as a bagel, Paul Rudd as the douchey dork manager of the supermarket, and James Franco as a druggie who manages to speak with the food.

Pay freaking attention during that scene. Don't do bath salts, kids...

Sausage Party is not a film for everyone. I enjoy a film like this once in awhile, but I'm going to need some time before I watch it again...like years. But it does a perfect job of satirizing the animated genre, deliver a thoughtful message, and leave a lasting impression on its audience.

Especially that last one. Christ, I won't be able to eat for weeks...



Friday, August 12, 2016

Film Review- "Suicide Squad"

Suicide Squad
Directed by David Ayer
Starring Will Smith, Margot Robbie, Joel Kinnaman and Viola Davis

The third time is definitely not the charm for the DC Extended Universe, as Suicide Squad fails to give the franchise that severe boost of quality it desperately needs. It suffers a lot of the same problems that Batman Vs Superman: Dawn of Justice did. But just like I said with Batman Vs Superman, I say to you here the reviews are being a lot harsher than they need to be, and there is still a little good in this film.

In the wake of Superman's death, director of A.R.G.U.S. Amanda Waller (Davis) moves to assemble a team of extraordinary-yet-expendable individuals to carry out high-risk missions for the government. Said individuals are a bunch of criminals and super villains, including but not limited to hit man Floyd Lawton a.k.a Deadshot (Smith), the twisted Harley Quinn (Robbie), and lowlife theif Captain Boomerang (Jai Courtney, who I can't believe I'm about to say isn't the worst part of this film).

When a deadly, supernatural threat in the form of The Enchantress (Cara Delevigne) threatens to rip the world apart, Waller assembles the Task Force X, led by Colonel Rick Flagg (Kinnaman) to quite simply save the world. Meanwhile Harley's beau, the clown prince of crime The Joker (Jared Leto) is on a rampage to reunite with his beloved.

If there was a script for this film most of it got thrown out when the footage was being edited. There's a big lack of character development, some actions and movements from scene to scene make little sense. With the exception of Deadshot and Harley, most of the team stays pretty two-dimensional. There's a romantic angle between Flagg and Dr. June Moore (the woman The Enchantress has possessed) but its so unnecessary and these characters aren't given their proper due so we can't get invested in it.

The final battle is so blatantly ripping off the final act of The Avengers it's not even funny, except with The Avengers it was with characters we had grown to love, and we actually cared what was going to happen. You could almost forgive that, if the action wasn't completely generic. Also I'm sorry, but it just makes zero sense why the US government would send common street criminals, to fight a thousand-year-old witch with unholy powers. Captain America wouldn't be sent to fight The Dark Elves. Batman wouldn't be called to fight General Zod…actually they both would still do those things and win because they're awesome. Anyway!

Well I told you that this film wasn't as bad as they were making it out to be, and I've probably proven myself wrong by now…or have I?!?…I don't know. The cast is the film's saving grace. Will Smith is giving his best as Deadshot, and Margot Robbie is an absolute perfect Harley Quinn. I can't believe I'm going to say this but I enjoyed Jai Courtney as Captain Boomerang. Joel Kinnaman plays Rick Flagg as a solid straight man to the Squad, but you can tell that there was supposed to be more to his character, that was either cut or he can't bring it. Viola Davis is Viola Davis as Amanda Waller. I could comment on Cara Delevigne as The Enchantress, if I thought it was actually her on the screen and not mostly CGI effects and a voice over artist. She's not really a villain or a character. More of a plot device sadly. Everyone else is sadly either sidelined or misused.

Ask for Jared Leto as our newest screen-adaptation of The Joker? Well the marketing lied to us. He's not in this film as much as we were led to believe. He does good work, but we need to see more of him before we can get a full taste of what this new Joker is like.

Finally the music in the film is top notch. Not the score itself, I honestly couldn't identify the instrumentals of this film to save my life, but the song choices. The variation of song choices is all over the place, but they're carefully selected and match the setting and tone of the film.

So how I can I still even recommend Suicide Squad to you? Well if you lower your expectations enough, you could end up enjoying this film to a degree. It's not going to be something a lot of people will rewatch over and over, but it is not unwatchable. There's still some pieces worth checking out, like the performances, the soundtrack, and there are some cool scenes that build up the DCEU, some including Leto's Joker and the return of Affleck's Batman. If you skip this film, it probably won't hurt you going forward in the franchise. If you do see it, great. There are worse ways to spend two-and-a-half hours, and you'll be introduced to some interesting characters you're likely to see more of.

Let's all keep in mind that this film was practically in the can before the Batman Vs Superman fiasco and Warner Bros. changed the regime overseeing the DCEU. So hopefully the worst is behind us, maybe the fourth time's the charm with Wonder Woman, and these characters/performances get better treatment going forward. Even the "Worst Heroes Ever" deserve something more.







Thursday, August 11, 2016

Film Review- "Ghostbusters"

Ghostbusters
Directed by Paul Feig
Starring Melissa McCarthy, Kristen Wiig, Kate McKinnon, and Leslie Jones

Let me just get some things out of the way, because I know I'll have to address them at some point. I was never against a third Ghostbusters film. I was never against a new team becoming the center of the story. I was never against that new team being all female. Despite what everyone was saying, I still believed that there was potential for this film to be great…but for me, it ended up just being okay.

The story of the new Ghostbusters begins when estranged friends and physicists Abby Yates and Erin Gilbert (McCarthy and Wiig) are called upon to investigate some paranormal activity when someone discovers their book on the paranormal. After a first successful...ghost busting? The girls decide to look further into their research, along with Erin's lab partner Dr. Jillian Holtzman (McKinnon) and New York City subway worker Patty Tolan (Jones). The team soon discovers there's more to all these ghosts appearing throughout the city, and uncover a far more dangerous threat that could destroy the world.

First off, the story is pretty thin. There's not much to the basic "bunch of misfits are called upon to save the world from some great threat" plot. The heart of the story is the relationship between Abby and Erin, but it's never really given enough attention for us as an audience to connect or care. That, and the film pretty much hits every story beat the first Ghostbusters hit. The characters think they can make ghost busting a business, the team is assembled, they gain attention, they get on the wrong side of the law…if you've seen the first one, you know where this is all going to wind up. The villain is weak, and his rise to power, and his plan, are underdeveloped.

But this is a comedy first and foremost. How funny is this, and how does the cast do? I only found myself laughing out loud a few times in the film. Most of the time they were just getting smiles and smirks out of me. The humor isn't crude, and it isn't clever, it's just kind of generic. The leading ladies, I always took issue with McCarthy and Wiig being cast in this film. Not because I don't think they're talented. They both already have great careers and these roles could have been given to dozens of other actresses more deserving of a bigger picture and a chance to show their comedic chops.

McCarthy has never been my favorite comedienne, and she gets the least laughs out of all four. Kristen Wiig is misused as mostly being the straight woman to everyone else. Kate McKinnon and Leslie Jones are absolutely hilarious. Chris Hemsworth actually ends up being one of the funniest people in this film, as the Ghostbusters' dim-witted receptionist. Another thing the film has going for it is the effects, which are incredibly vibrant and eye-catching.

At the end of the day though I just have to get nitpicky here and ask, why does this film exist within a different continuity from the first two films? Especially when Murray, Akroyd, Hudson, Weaver, and Potts all show up for cameos. Who's to say they all couldn't have spent the same amount of time on set reprising their old roles here opposed to these faceless incidental characters? Why couldn't this new team have heard of the old and been inspired by them, instead of this unnecessary reboot of the franchise? I digress.

Ghostbusters isn't bad, and it isn't great. It's just there, as a sometimes funny and sometimes charming film. Ghostbuster purists shouldn't be offended, and comedy fans should be satisfied. It's a harmless little film that probably won't gain the following of the original, but will still have an audience as time goes on.

….Reviewin' makes me feel good.




Tuesday, June 28, 2016

Film Review- "Finding Dory"

Finding Dory
Directed by Andrew Stanton
Starring Ellen DeGeneres, Albert Brooks, and Ed O'Neill

I think it's safe to say that Finding Nemo was when audiences first realized that Pixar had the power to rip our hearts out and bring us to tears with their films. I mean, that opening…and that ending, I need a moment…

Many Pixar films that would come after Finding Nemo such as Up, Toy Story 3, and Inside Out would have the same emotional effect on audiences. That said, in the past few years Pixar's had some misfires, like Cars 2, Monsters University, and The Good Dinosaur. Notice how two of those were sequels? Toy Story films aside, Pixar hasn't had the best track record with its sequels. Does Finding Dory break that pattern, or has Pixar misfired once more? Well, yes and no. On with the review!

Finding Dory takes place a year after its predecessor, with Dory (DeGeneres) now living on the reef with Marlin (Brooks) and Nemo (Now played by Hayden Rolence). Dory suddenly has memories of her parents, and is instantly rushing across the sea to find them, with Marlin and Nemo in tow. Their journey leads them to the Marine Life Institute in Morro Bay, California.

They're not there for very long when Dory is caught and brought into the institute. Once inside she meets a cranky octopus named Hank (O'Neill), who she recruits into helping her search the institute for her parents, while Marlin and Nemo try to get inside and find her.

If any of this sounds remotely familiar to you…well that's not shocking at all. For the first half-hour or so, and many other points in the film, Dory hits a lot of the same story beats as Nemo. It's not a complete role-reversal where Nemo and Marlin have to go find Dory this time, in fact two-thirds through the film we're not spending too much time with them at all.

That and Dory's character arc is distinguishable enough from Marlin's to give Dory a bit of a fresh angle. Her problem of short-term memory loss is handled incredibly well by the writers, and transforms her into a three-dimensional character, opposed to a sidekick with a running gag (I'm looking at you Cars 2.) That said, I still hold Finding Nemo to be the better film, as I found its story easier to get emotionally invested in, but perhaps that's a personal preference. Whereas Nemo was heavy on heart, Dory is heavy on humor (Still plenty of feels to go around, though.), but I was laughing out loud at a lot of the jokes.

The voice cast is phenomenal. DeGeneres brings twice the laughs and twice the heart to Dory this time around (No surprise. She's been waiting to make this film for thirteen years). Albert Brooks as Marlin is still warm and cranky, but he isn't given as much to do this time around. Hayden Rolence takes over the role of Nemo well enough. Ed O'Neill as Hank, and Ty Burell as Bailey are fantastic, even though they are playing to their Modern Family types. Kaitlin Olson as Destiny is cute. Idris Elba and Dominic West as a pair of sea lions are the absolute scene stealers.

Finding Dory is very well made, though it treads familiar ground, and may not reach the emotional heights of some superior Pixar entries. It's a delightful, funny, family film with heart. It may not be remembered as one of Pixar's best in the years to come, but oh well. Not every Pixar film has to be Toy Story 3 or Up. This is a film that didn't have to be made, but it was, and it was made well. That's certainly worth remembering.


Film Review - "Captain America: Civil War"

Captain America: Civil War
Directed by Anthony & Joe Russo
Starring Chris Evans, Robert Downey Jr, Sebastian Stan, and Chadwick Boseman

Oh my emotions. Watching your favorite superheroes kick the crap out of each other, that takes it out of you. At the same time though, that's what helps make Captain America: Civil War not just one of the best Marvel films of all time, but one of the best superhero films of all time.

Following the events of Avengers: Age of Ultron and an encounter with Crossbones (Frank Grillo) that ends horribly with civilian casualties, the government is calling for The Avengers to be put under the control of a United Nations panel, with the signing of the Sokovia Accords. Naturally, one half of the team is against the Accords, while the other half is for it. The first half is led by Steve Rogers/Captain America (Evans), and the second by Tony Stark/Iron Man (Downey).

As this inner conflict unfolds, The Winter Soldier/Steve's old friend Bucky Barnes (Stan) remerges, supposedly the one behind a bombing of the United Nations. Steve and Sam Wilson/The Falcon (Anthony Mackie) take it upon themselves to investigate, now acting outside the law. As the hunt for Bucky unfolds, superheroes both new and familiar are drawn into the conflict, while a mysterious figure named Helmut Zemo (Daniel Bruhl) operates in the shadows. Things will never be the same as disagreement between teammates turns into an all out brawl.

The script here is fantastic, building upon every character's development and storyline threaded through the past dozen films. Everything in the Marvel Cinematic Universe has built to this, and it all comes to head in a glorious spectacle. Every piece of dialogue, every fight scene has emotional weight to it, and the audience really feels it.

The airport sequence is everything everyone has been ranting and raving about. It's an explosive set piece and one of the best action scenes put to film in the superhero genre. The final fight, which I won't spoil, packs one hell of a gut punch, and is a pure edge-of-your-seat thrills.

A film this packed, you think some characters would go underdeveloped, but everyone gets their moment to shine in the film. Paul Rudd brings some big laughs as Ant-Man. Sebastian Stan gets to bring Bucky to some amazing new places, and the comedic pairing of Bucky & Falcon is wonderful. Elizabeth Olsen gets much more to do as Scarlet Witch, and really works the material. Daniel Bruhl as Helmut Zemo is no question, the best villain in the MCU since Tom Hiddelston's Loki.

Then we have our two newest Avengers, Spider-Man and Black Panther, played by Tom Holland and Chadwick Boseman. Tom Holland is now the definitive Spider-Man. Young, hopeful, cocky and ready to play with the big boys, this is the young Peter Parker from the comics come to life. Chadwick Boseman is the coolest of cool as Prince T'Challa, the Black Panther. I can't wait for their standalone films.

Then there's our two leads, Chris Evans as Captain America and Robert Downey Jr. as Iron Man. While this film is packed with Avengers, this is still a Captain America story, as Steve Rogers continues to adjust to this modern world and fight for what he believes in. Chris Evans, his fifth outing as the titular hero, possibly gives his best performance of the MCU so far, handling both heavy-hitting set pieces and character moments. Robert Downey Jr., now having played Tony Stark for six films, brings the evolution of the character to dark, emotional new places. This is a different Tony Stark, and its incredibly compelling to watch Downey bring this character to life once more.

Honestly the whole cast is incredible, new and old faces of the franchise, but it'd be tedious to go down the entire roster. Henry Jackman's score is beautiful, featuring some truly moving pieces of music. The film is perfectly paced. It's hard to find any real flaw in the film, and that's not Marvel bias. Sure you could argue the introduction of Spider-Man into the MCU feels shoe-horned, or that Zemo wasn't need to create the conflict of Civil War, but everything is done so well its justified.

Another MCU film has come and gone, and here I am embodying the stereotype of the Marvel fanboy once again. Regardless, I think the voice of the critics and audiences can back me up here. Captain America: Civil War is an explosive, emotional film that is easily one of the best superhero films ever made. It's an easy recommendation. Even if you're not a diehard MCU fan, the film will still appeal to you on some level. I mean you're watching Captain America and Iron Man fight. That's like…watching Batman and Superman….okay maybe not like that….I'm sorry I couldn't resist one little jab…

If you haven't already, check out my take on how we got to Captain America: Civil War, both from Cap's and Tony's point of view.


Monday, June 27, 2016

The Road To "Captain America: Civil War" Part 2

Well this is late...anyway I'll just preface this with there will be no spoilers for Captain America: Civil War in this piece, and my review of the film will come soon enough.

Now that we've examined the Star Spangled Man with A Plan (If you haven't read part one yet, please do so), let's take a look at the cinematic journey of genius-billionaire-playboy-philanthropist, Tony Stark aka Iron Man (Robert Downey Jr.)

When Tony is still in captivity of the Ten Rings in the first Iron Man, Yensin (Shaun Toub) asks him if he has a family, to which Tony says no. Yensin replies, "So you are a man who has everything and nothing." How true is that. The Tony that we're looking at right now lives an empty life of drinking, partying, and sleeping around. He gets no real fulfillment from any of this. There's something seriously missing from his life.

Later on in the film, after Tony escapes (and Yensin tells him not to waste his life), he's speaking to Pepper (Gwyneth Palytrow) about his current path. She disapproves, but Tony tells her, "I just finally know what I have to do…and I know in my heart, that it's right." Tony knows that Yensin was right. He has wasted his life. The weapons manufacturing has done its good work, but its also done its damage, and now he's seen that first hand. It's time for Tony to add something positive to the world.
Now we have a humble Tony, with a better understanding of his purpose, and what he can do with his life.

While he may be humbler, it's still very much all about him. Old habits die hard. Even at the end of the film, he goes for an extra bit of glory declaring to the press, "I am Iron Man." In the post credits scene, Nick Fury (Samuel L. Jackson) tells Tony "You've become a part of a bigger universe, you just don't know it yet." He would soon learn how right Fury was, the hard way...more on that later.

Iron Man 2 opens with Tony facing death once more. The core of the arc reactor in his chest is slowly poisoning him. In times of near death, the question of one's legacy arises, and Tony begins to deal with his own.

At this point in his life, his legacy is Iron Man. The weapons manufacturing, that's a thing of the past. Now, the government is fighting him to turn over the Iron Man technology, which is both his legacy and identity. Unfortunately, the government does get their hands on the suit, which leaves Tony down in the dumps…or rather, up in a giant donut nursing a hangover.

The film also turns a spotlight on Tony's relationship with his father, Howard Stark (John Slattery/Dominic Cooper). The legacy of a parent often transcends the legacy of a child (In a literal sense, Tony did take over his father's company at the young age of twenty-one). Then when we learn Tony and Howard's relationship was cold and distant, you start to wonder, did Tony ever want the life of Stark Industries? Was weapons manufacturing ever really what he wanted to do? It would make sense if this life felt empty too him, and it never felt what he was meant to do.

As Fury tells him though, Howard had bigger plans for Tony. Plans that extended beyond taking over the company, but finishing his life's work. Howard had a grander design for the arc reactor technology, but his plans were far ahead of the science of his time. Therefore, as we learn in a recorded message from long ago, Howard would leave the rest of his plans to his son.

Howard trusted that his only son could be the one to accomplish this. He had all the faith in Tony, as he tells him "My greatest creation, will always be you." Armed with this newfound knowledge and affection from his father, Tony is able to create a new element to power the arc reactor, and therefore save his own life again. The part of his legacy he inherited from his father, has directly reinvigorated the part of his legacy from Iron Man. That brings a greater emotional weight to what Tony does with the Iron Man technology. This is his work, and no politician can take that away from him.

Now if you recall, Tony's father Howard got a little close with a certain super soldier back in the day. Of course I'm talking about Steve Rogers, Captain America (Chris Evans). In The Avengers, Tony finally gets to meet the man his father spoke so highly of in his youth. Naturally, they don't get along too well. Steve is a team-player and plays by the book, Tony does what he wants and breaks the rules if he has to. Polar opposites in a way.

One could look at Tony's relationship with Steve as like a jealous, sibling rivalry type deal. Steve being the older brother Howard always idolized, while Tony never meeting his father's expectations in his youth. Now he finally meets this "symbolic big-brother" and is like "What the hell this guy's a square. I'm better than this."

Steve strikes a chord with Tony later on in the film. He calls Tony out, tells him he's no more than the suit of armor he parades around in (Now that suit's become pretty important to him at this point in the films. I'm sure that hurts.) and that "the only thing you really fight for is yourself. You're not the guy to make the sacrifice play…" Tony after all is a bit self-absorbed, and does have a narcissist streak. Hey the SHIELD files said so. Tony knows he doesn't play well with others. But when you think about it, when he hears Captain America himself saying this stuff, might that not hit a little harder? Isn't it easier to admit your own flaws to yourself than to someone else, much less this American icon your father always regarded so highly?

Anyway in the climatic battle of The Avengers Tony defies expectations and makes the ultimate sacrifice, when he carries the nuclear missile through the wormhole and out of the galaxy, nearly losing his life. Here is where Tony contradicts Steve's views of him. He risks his own life, and becomes a part of something bigger. He finally sees that he's part of that universe Nick Fury was talking about…and that scares him.

It should come as no surprise that Tony is portrayed as a victim of PTSD. Not just from his experience of being captured by terrorists, but by flying through a wormhole to another galaxy, facing possible death for the near-hundredth time. This is the Tony we see in Iron Man 3. When we ended The Avengers, he was on Mock 7 of the Iron Man suit. Now only a year or so later, he's on Mock 42. Wow. That's a lot of suit building.

All these different suits have different features for multiple scenarios…or multiple threats. This is a coping mechanism. He explains to Pepper, "Gods, aliens, other dimensions…I'm just a man in a can." and that he can't sleep, because he's in constant fear of danger. "Just a man in a can…" isn't that sort of a callback to Steve's "big man in a suit of armor" remark? Hmm...

He tells Pepper his suits are a part of him, she argues they're just distractions. The only way Tony has survived so far is because of the technology he's created with Iron Man. So in a dark sort of way, he's building all these machines so he can in fact protect himself and the people he cares about from the likes of Loki (Tom Hiddleston), Chiutari, etc.

The part of Tony's legacy, where he is Iron Man, has become convoluted in his mind. He believes without the suit or armor, he is nothing. The suit is what makes the man, but by the end of Iron Man 3, he realizes that man makes the suit. For most of Iron Man 3, Tony is fighting the bad guys and saving the day with only small bits of his tech. He only really suits up once or twice in the film. In the closing moments, Tony has the arc reactor removed from his chest, and all his suits are destroyed.

He narrates that his armor "was never a distraction, or a hobby, it was a cocoon. Now, I'm a changed man. You can take away my house, all my tricks and toys. One thing you can't take away…I am Iron Man." He has come to a better understanding of his own legacy. Like he has said many times before, he is Iron Man. Not because of the suit, but what he does with it.

Regardless, Tony still suffers from PTSD, and that is not something that is easily cured. Scarlet Witch (Elizabeth Olsen) brings his fears and anxieties back to the surface in the opening moments of Avengers: Age of Ultron. She shows him a vision of the world under siege of the Chiutari once more, and his fellow Avengers have fallen. In this vision, Steve tells Tony with his final breath, "You could have saved us…why didn't you do more?" The threats that plagued Tony in Iron Man 3 still plague him now, and he feels he has not done enough to protect the world. So…he takes Loki's scepter, and he creates Ultron (James Spader).

We all know that ends spectacularly, right? Even the best intentions can go astray, and Tony does in fact have the best intentions. He fights with Steve at the Barton Farmhouse, that everything he did in creating Ultron was to stop the world's need for The Avengers, "Isn't that the why we fight? So we can end the fight, and go home?" Tony wants it to stop. He wants the world to be safe, and he's slowly come to the realization that this act as Iron Man can't do it. That's why he built Ultron, the Iron Legion, and all those suits. He knows he is not enough, and continuing to fight like he is enough has taken its toll on his mind and body.

So what is enough, you ask? Well, perhaps a system of accords that keeps super powered people in check, that prevents them from causing anymore damage than they need to get the job done? Enter Captain America: Civil War, where Tony is once again trying to make the world a safer place. He's trying to do good, after his work as Iron Man, his work with Ultron, has proved to only cause as much bad as good.

Now I'd love to further this analysis through Captain America: Civil War, but that's another piece for another day, and I'd like to write my review on it first. To conclude, we now see where both Captain America and Iron Man have come from. Two sides of the same coin, in some ways. One fighting his whole life to find a sense of belonging, purpose. The other desperate to right the wrongs of the past, and leave a worthy mark on the world. Good men, trying to be better…just in different ways. United they stand. Divided they fall...




Thursday, May 5, 2016

The Road To "Captain America: Civil War" Part 1

In just a few days, Phase Three of the Marvel Cinematic Universe will begin with Captain America: Civil War. The third Captain America film, the thirteenth film in the entire MCU, and the culmination of all that's come before (I'm sure that's been said about quite a few films in this franchise). Specifically though, it brings us to a crucial point in the history of two of the franchise's most beloved characters: Steve Rogers/Captain America (Chris Evans), and Tony Stark/Iron Man (Robert Downey Jr.).

Both have come a long way, and after over a dozen films have reached a crossroads. How did we get here?

First, let's look at The Star Spangled Man with The Plan, and go to the very beginning, with Captain America: The First Avenger. When we first meet Steve Rogers, he's scrawny, insignificant, and desperate to join the war effort. When Dr. Abraham Erksine (Stanley Tucci) asks him why he's so set on becoming a solider, he tells him, "I don't like bullies. I don't care where they're from." He tells his best friend Bucky (Sebastian Stan), "There are men laying down their lives. I got no right to do any less than them."

Steve Rogers, right from the get-go, is presented to us as selfless, virtuous man. He is good because it's the right thing to do. Now, Captain America is my favorite superhero, but if I may, let's scratch beneath the surface here.

He's not just looking to do what's right for his country...he's looking for a sense of belonging, of purpose. There are subtle hints throughout the MCU, that Steve is a bit of a tragic character. As Loki calls him in The Avengers, "A man out of time." A deleted scene showcases Steve struggling adjust to modern times. However, Steve's lack of belonging begins long before the events of The Avengers.

In The First Avenger, Steve tells Peggy Carter (Hayley Atwell) that not many women are lining up to dance with a guy like him. In Captain America: The Winter Soldier, he tells Sam Wilson (Anthony Mackie) and Natasha Romanoff/Black Widow (Scarlett Johansson) that "even when I had nothing I had Bucky." This is a lonely guy, with, no romantic prospects, and only one real friend. Both his parents are dead, as we learn in flashbacks in Winter Soldier, so he has no family either. Holy cow, someone give this guy a hug.

When Steve is given his super-soldier makeover in The First Avenger, he's given an opportunity to find all these things. He finds romance with Peggy Carter. He gains friends, brother-in-arms, not just with Bucky, but with his Howling Commandos. More so, he has a purpose...and just like that, he loses it all. Steve makes the grand sacrifice, crash lands his plane into the sea, and wakes up 70 years later. Everything he desperately wanted in life is now gone.

It's lightly touched on The Avengers, and more so in The Winter Soldier, that Steve is trying to reclaim what he's lost when he went in the ice. As Peggy tells him though, the world has changed, "and the best that we can do, is to start over." So, he starts over. He joins with SHIELD, The Avengers, and jumps back onto the battlefield. But where Steve is a selfless soldier, conforming to a regime, there's someone else who's the complete opposite.

Yes that individual is Tony Stark a.k.a. Iron Man, who we'll talk about more in part 2, but for now I'll suggest that Steve sees Tony as a threat to everything he believes in as a soldier, and a person. Steve is humble and honest. Tony is selfish and self-absorbed. Steve calls him out on his behavior several times in The Avengers, and here is the start of their conflict which will boil over for many films to come.

There's one sequence in The Avengers I do want to touch on. Tony suspects Nick Fury (Samuel L. Jackson) is hiding something within SHIELD, and starts to dig through encrypted files. Steve tells him to stop being such a rebel and follow orders. After a brief confrontation, Steve decides to investigate for himself, which is when he discovers Phase Two (No not Iron Man 3 through Ant Man), SHIELD's plan to use the Tesseract to make weapons to combat threats from other worlds. Confirming his polar opposite's suspicions, this is where Steve's distrust of Fury & SHIELD begin, which will grow further in The Winter Soldier.

The battlefield is not what Steve remembers it, and I'm not just talking about the difference between Nazis and the Chiutari. Everything isn't in black and white anymore. The lines of good and bad are blurred, which he learns working with Black Widow and Nick Fury in SHIELD. He constantly disagrees with their actions, claiming they are not what make an army or a team. It doesn't take long for him to realize that the likes of Widow & Fury are the least of his troubles, when Hydra is revealed to have secretly infiltrated SHIELD, years after his disappearance.

So after that doozy of a revelation, Steve has a change of heart. He no longer wants to blindly report to faceless government regimes with hidden agendas, which is when The Avengers become an organization independent of SHIELD, as we see in Avengers: Age of Ultron, with both him and Tony as co-leaders (Yeah. That'll go over well.)

Well it doesn't take long for Steve to realize that Tony has hidden agendas all his own, when his secret plans with Bruce Banner (Mark Ruffalo) to create Ultron (James Spader) backfire horribly, and come to the light of the rest of The Avengers. Steve's naturally not pleased at all by this, and claims Tony's actions would hurt the team. Tony counters that his actions would end the team, asking Steve, "isn't that the why we fight? So we can end the fight, and go home??"

Steve counters with, "Every time someone tries to win a war before it starts innocent people die. Every time." The line implies that Steve believes their fight is not yet finished, or on a personal level, that his fight is not yet finished.

Earlier in the film, in his illusion created by Scarlet Witch, Steve is back in the days of World War II. It's a celebration, supposedly after the Allies have won. Peggy appears to him, saying "The war is over Steve. We can go home." Suddenly, Steve is alone in the empty dance hall. He can't go home. Not the home he knows. It's gone, a remnant of a time period long ago.

Peggy's words echo in his mind. After Thor (Chris Hemsworth) leaves the Hawkeye Family Barn. He turns to go back inside, and you hear her "We can go home" replay...and Steve stands there, staring through the doorway. Almost as if he can't cross the threshold...as if he can't go home.

So it's no surprise that when Tony says "so we can go home?" Steve snaps both on the inside, and on the outside tearing a block of wood in half. Home for Tony is a nice house in Malibu with Pepper. Home for Hawkeye (Jeremy Renner) is the farm with his wife and kids. What's home for Steve now? He has none of that. The fight can't end, because once the mission is accomplished, he'll have nothing.

By the end of Age of Ultron, that may not matter anymore. He tells Tony that the version of himself that wanted a stable family life may not exist anymore. He glances over the new Avengers Headquarters, with new recruits (or "soldiers" we'll call them for sense of parallels) running about, and tells Tony, "He's home." Steve has found home, by making his life as a solider, a hero, his home life. Steve's position as an Avenger suddenly carries a lot more personal weight.

In a deleted scene from Age of Ultron, Steve tells Maria Hill (Cobie Smulders) that if Ultron was doing what he's supposed to, he'd hang up his shield. Hill questions his words, to which Steve has no response. He know he can't give up his position as an Avenger, because it's all he's got, and by the end of the film, he's going to make the most of it.

Which finally brings us to Civil War, where everything Steve has worked so hard to achieve is being threatened once more. Government agendas poise to overtake him once more, and take everything away from him, including literally the last bit of his old life, Bucky. Captain America once again must fight to preserve his purpose and his identity, which will bring him into direct conflict with Iron Man.

For a look at Tony Stark's side of the coin, stay tuned for part 2.



Saturday, April 30, 2016

Film Review Throwback- "The Perfect Host"

The Perfect Host
Directed by Nick Tomnay
Starring David Hyde Pierce and Clayne Crawford

God bless Netflix. Really. If it weren't for Netflix I'd never be able to see a lot of independent films that only make their way through festivals and limited releases. I mean I can't afford to go to Sundance every year. So I'm thankful the likes of Netflix, Redbox, illegal online streaming….provides me the opportunity to see films like this one.

The Perfect Host came out way back in 2010, and when I saw the trailer I was intrigued. It looked to be offering, essentially, Niles Crane from Frasier going pure evil. Six years later I've finally seen the film, and it delivers just that, and more...

The film opens on criminal John Taylor (Crawford), on the run for a robbery he recently pulled with his girlfriend (Megahn Perry). Injured and desperate for refuge, he cons his way into the home of Warwick Wilson (Pierce), who is in the midst of planning a dinner party. It isn't long before the jig is up for John and he's trying to hold Warwick hostage. The tables quickly turn, when its revealed Warwick has drugged the wine John's been drinking all night. John learns Warwick is not what he seems, and soon he's the hostage for one of the most bizzare dinner parties ever witnessed.

There's much more going on in this film that I can't tell you without going into spoilers, but it is one nutty film. A lot of twists and turns come out of nowhere, some that are probably not properly hinted at or set up, but who cares this is a twisted black comedy if I've ever seen one. You'll be face palming and chuckling to yourself at how far gone this thing goes, and in a good way, because it's a fun ride.

Now a lot of the film's success falls onto the two leads, but where one gives a great performance, the other gives a pretty bland one. I'm sure it's a no brainer to you which one is which. Yes, this is David Hyde Pierce's film 150%. He gives such a gripping, wild, colorful performance he owns every second on screen. This is not Niles Crane. This is Niles Crane meets Stewie Griffin meets Raymond Reddington. Sadly on the other side of things, Clayne Crawford can't measure up. He gives such a bland, one-dimensional performance, and the character comes off so unlikable you don't care what happens to him.

Maybe that's the idea though…maybe the filmmakers cast an unknown amateur in the role to make him seem every more unlikable David Hyde Pierce in his role. I mean it's Pierce not Crawford on all the posters and stuff. Whoa…

Anyway, The Perfect Host is an insane, fun little film. It is dark, and might not be for everyone. You might watch it once and never watch it again, or it might be a frequent rewatch depending on your taste. I enjoy a black comedy from time to time, and I loved Frasier, so this was definitely one I was glad to finally see. Thanks Netflix.


Film Review Throwback- "Walt Before Mickey"

Walt Before Mickey
Directed by Koha Le
Starring Thomas Ian Nichols, Jon Heder, and Armando Gutierrez

It's honestly very surprising that a proper film about the life of Walt Disney hasn't been made yet. I can see part of the challenge in it though. Disney had a long, illustrious life and career, and it could be difficult for a script to find its focus. A screenwriter could arguably take one period of Disney's history and script a film out of it. Saving Mr. Banks did that to much success. Walt Before Mickey, not so much.

Now Walt Before Mickey does focus on one period of the man's life, but perhaps too big a period. Based on the book of the same name by Timothy S. Susanin, the film focuses on the first ten years of his career, before he created Mickey Mouse. Now not every average joe would know this, but Walt suffered a lot of setbacks before the mouse was made. If you didn't know, this film will definitely hammer that fact into your head.

We see every one of those setbacks, from his losing of Oswald The Lucky Rabbit, to being evicted out of his office and apartment. It's just all very depressing. Imagine, a film about Walt Disney being depressing. There's a lot of telling and not enough showing, and with the over-abundance of narration I mean that literally. There are some sweet moments in the film, but on a whole the pacing and the tone of the film is just off.

There is this strange subplot in the film, about Walt befriending a mouse he finds on the street (Yeah I know. So subtle.) that was obviously crafted by the filmmakers, that just comes off as a lame attempt to give some bit of structure to the script.

Not to attack the filmmakers themselves, but the whole film has a very cheap feel to it. Yes, I know it's an independent film, but everything is almost at amateur level. The film is just too weak to carry the rich source material its trying to adapt.

The same can be said for the acting. Honestly no performances stand out over all the rest. All seem to be giving their mediocre quality work. Nichols (Kevin from American Pie in case you couldn't recognize him...) as Disney is tolerable at best. Special criticism is reserved for Jon Heder as Roy Disney, who comes off as just so painfully dumb and wooden in his performance, but hey, this is the guy who gave us Napoleon Dynamite.

With a little more effort and production value, Walt Before Mickey could have been a better film. Instead it comes off as something in between "film students' senior capstone" and "low-budget indie". I'd say if you have any interest in the life and career of Walt Disney, give it a look if you have the time, but don't rush to this. There are plenty of better ways to learn how it all started before the mouse.



Friday, April 29, 2016

Film Review- "Zootopia"

Zootopia
Directed by Byron Howard & Rich Moore
Starring Ginnifer Goodwin, Jason Bateman, and Idris Elba

At first glance, Zootopia seems like just another generic animated comedy, with anthropomorphic animals. Something simple just to entertain the kids for two hours, that in no way could reach the same level of Disney pedigree like Frozen, Tangled, or something older like The Jungle Book. Looks can be decieving, as Zootopia ends up being one of the best and most clever films Disney Animation has ever produced. That's pretty ironic, when you consider the message at the heart of the film, but more on that later.

Judy Hopps (Goodwin) makes history becoming the first rabbit officer of the police department of Zootopia, a city where all animals have evolved, and predators and prey live in peace. Being the new gal and underestimated for the fact that she's a rabbit, she's assigned to mundane parking duty. Her chance for glory comes when she takes it upon herself to solve a missing mammals case (one of fourteen in Zootopia) in less than 48 hours, or she resigns.

With absolutely no evidence to go on, she recruits the only witness, a con-man fox (con-fox?) by the name of Nick Wilde (Bateman) to help her solve the case. As they carry on the search, they discover a bigger conspiracy in the works, and suddenly the fate of the city is in their…paws.

Zootopia is much more clever than it's marketing suggests, which has been filled with animal puns and pop cultural references. Yes there is a good amount of that, but taking place in a universe that mimics our own it works, and Zootopia has a subtle but strong commentary on the world today. Briefly on the universe of the film, it's incredibly well crafted, and puts the likes of Chicken Little to shame. The filmmakers clearly put a lot of thought and creativity into crafting this world.

Zootopia tackles important issues of prejudice, stereotypes, and discrimination incredibly well. Again, not something you'd expect from a film starring a talking bunny and fox (There in lies the irony). The message is not hammered into the viewer's head, but it's strong enough to leave a lasting impression.

What makes the film so enjoyable is that the chemistry between the two leads, perfectly written by the screenwriters, and performed by Goodwin and Bateman. Goodwin, who has become synonymous with Snow White thanks to ABC's Once Upon A Time is unrecognizable, diving headfirst into the incredibly likable and relatable Judy. Bateman gives Nick plenty of his trademark snakiness, but with much more warmth. The rest of the voice cast is great too, Idris Elba in as Chief Bogo being one of the highlights, and Nate Torrence as Officer Benjamin Clawhauser being the very definition of a scene stealer. The likes of JK Simmons, Jenny Slate, and Shakira all turn in great work in small supporting roles.

If there's any flaw I could find in this film, it's just one, and it's the villain. In the final act of the film, without getting too spoilery, it pulls a Hans from Frozen "trick". I put "trick" in quotation marks because I know at least one other animated film has used this move in the past few years. Is it better than just having an obviously sinister looking character like Jafar or Scar walk on the scene? Maybe so, but if films keep pulling this, villains are going to become obvious in a whole new way.

Zootopia works on so many levels. As an animated film, as a buddy cop film, and as an inspirational film. It definitely earns a spot alongside some of Disney animation's greatest works, due to it's amazing cast and characters, incredibly crafted setting, and script. It's an instant classic, that will become a hallmark for Walt Disney Pictures in the years to come.





Saturday, March 26, 2016

Film Review - "Batman V. Superman: Dawn of Justice"

Batman V. Superman: Dawn of Justice
Directed by Zach Snyder
Starring Henry Cavill, Ben Affleck, and Gal Gadot 

The best place to start is by saying the waves of hate drowning this film on its opening weekend are not justified. I can't believe I'm in a position where I'm defending a film directed by Zach Snyder, one of the most frustrating filmmakers of our time in my opinion. That said, while I did enjoy Batman V. Superman: Dawn of Justice, it is not a flawless film. There are problems that have to be addressed, so on we go.

Two year have passed since the events of Man of Steel and Superman's (Cavill) destructive battle with General Zod (Michael Shannon), which laid waste to most of Metropolis. Since then Bruce Wayne (Affleck) has held a deep grudge against him, fearing Superman could one day use his god-like powers to wipe out the entire planet. Getting back into the guise of Batman, Wayne makes it his mission to take him out before he even has the chance to.

Superman/Clark Kent continues with his struggle to find a place in the world, that right now doesn't know wether to fear or admire him. Meanwhile, Lois Lane (Amy Adams) investigates…something, that becomes relevant later on in the film. Billionaire Lex Luthor (Jesse Eisenberg) sets out to get his hands on some Kryptonite for his own devices, while Bruce also does some investigating against him. Then we have the mysterious Diana Prince/Wonder Woman (Gadot) with her own agenda, and sprinkled in between all that are some teases for Justice League….so yeah, a lot going on here.

If you remember The Amazing Spider-Man 2 at all, this is the same problem that film had. The first act is incredibly choppy, and there's a lot of of jumping from plot thread to plot thread. Unlike The Amazing Spider-Man 2 though, all the threads somehow come together in a moment I'm not sure I can share because it's a little spoilerish. That said, until the film gets to that point around the one-hour mark, it's very messy. The Justice League tie-ins while cool, felt very shoehorned in. Thankfully, it all concludes in an action-packed, absolutely awesome third act.

Let's talk about the performances. Henry Cavill, I really like as Superman, but he felt like a plot device in his own movie. Honestly, he barely had any dialogue. It just doesn't seem like Cavill is being given the proper chance to develop this character. My views on Man of Steel have changed since I first saw it (Seriously I was too kind in that review) but Cavill/Superman was almost treated a similar way in that film as well. Ben Affleck is awesome as Bruce Wayne/Batman, playing him with the perfect amount of charisma and gruff. Guys, Ben Affleck might be our best Batman yet. I am absolutely in love with Gal Gadot as Wonder Woman, and I cannot wait for her solo film next year.

Amy Adams is perfect again as Lois Lane. Jeremy Irons is so cool as Alfred. Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor….oh my god. So many times I wanted to scream "Shut up!" at the screen. His performance is just odd, cringeworthy, and downright annoying. I think there was only one or two good scenes where I actually enjoyed him as Lex. Hopefully going forward in the DC Extended Universe, be it Justice League or a straight Man of Steel sequel, we see very little of him.

Zach Snyder….oh, Zach Snyder. You can direct some really great action pieces but you just can't stop yourself from over-stylizing shit sometimes can you? His biggest offense in this category is a flashback to the deaths of Bruce Wayne's parents. Yeah you get to see that again. Then there's a scene where Superman performs a rescue at a Day of the Dead festival, and the end of it is just so….silly. It's been shown in most of the trailers. I'm talking about this:


Doesn't look any better on screen trust me. That said, most of the action scenes are incredible. The titular showdown between Batman and Superman isn't as grand as you'd expect it to be, but it's still epic. The showdown between Superman, Batman, and Wonder Woman against Doomsday is pure awesome. Oh by the way, Doomsday looks like shit. Literally. Like a humanoid piece of cat poop. Last thing, the music for this film is amazing and has been on repeat in my house ever since I got home from the theater.

So to conclude, I find Batman V. Superman to be a solidly entertaining film, that manages to get where it needs to despite some pretty outstanding flaws. Who is to blame? I don't think Zach Snyder deserves all the discredit. The screenwriters? Perhaps. The studio heads who laid down the law? I mean more than likely. The blunt cynic in me wants to say that at base level this is just playing catch-up to the Marvel Cinematic Universe. "Boooooo!!!!" Oh shut up!!!!

Anyway, was there a better course to take for the DCEU? Yeah sure. A direct sequel to Man of Steel, push the Wonder Woman film up further, maybe-but-a-not totally necessary standalone Batman film, and then this film? Who knows? I don't have the power to offer a Plan B. I'll just look at the film we got, which isn't great, but is definitely not terrible. This a case where you have to stop listening to the critics, get to the theater, and make your own opinion. I guarantee you won't be totally disappointed with what you see.


Top 10 Films of 2015

Better late than never? I wanted to see a few more films before I finalized my list. Still haven't seen every film from 2015 I wanted to or probably should have seen. Oh well. Here are my top films of 2015. That I've seen. So far...and once again, my top films. Not yours. Mine....let's begin.

10.  Creed
Directed by Ryan Coogler
Starring Michael B. Jordan and Sylvester Stallone

The Rocky films can always get you pumped up when you're watching them, but they also have a lot of heart to them, and Creed is no exception. But at the same time, it breathes new life into a tired franchise, with a story about legacy and identity. The director/actor combo of Coogler and Jordan is proving to be a force to be reckoned with, and some of the fight choreography is stunning. Stallone gives one of his best performances, taking the character of Rocky Balboa to new, emotional heights. I certainly didn't expect Creed to be a success, but I'm very glad I was wrong.

9. Ant-Man
Directed by Peyton Reed
Starring Paul Rudd, Evangeline Lily, and Michael Douglas

This was a tough call. I knew there was no way I could put both this and Avengers: Age of Ultron on this list (I mean I certainly could have and you would all been like 'Oh what a surprise both MCU movies made it to Chris's Top 10 of 2015. Well surprise on YOU, mother lovers! Age of Ultron ain't on here!!). There were a lot of heavy hitters last year for me, and frankly when it comes down to it, Ant-Man is the better made film. The humor is off-the-wall, the script is more fluid, and it throws something new onto the Marvel Cinematic chessboard. Plus, Thomas The Tank Engine proved far more menacing than Ultron. Now, put your knives down and let's move on to number eight...

8. Kingsman: The Secret Service
Directed by Matthew Vaughn
Starring Taron Edgerton, Colin Firth, and Samuel L. Jackson

Kingsman is one of the craziest, grooviest, action-packed films I've seen in most recent years. Fresh newcomer Taron Edgerton gives a career-jump-starting performance, which is something to say when he's working with such pedigree like Colin Firth and Michael Caine, who you would think be phoning in it a film like this, but they most definitely are not. The humor is outrageous. Honestly, how could a film that has Colin Firth, single-handedly fight his way out of a vicious shootout in a church full of radicals, all set to the guitar solo from "Free Bird" not end up on anyone's Top Films of 2015 list? Seriously if you're looking for a very well made, very fun film, see Kingsman.

 7. Mr. Holmes
Directed by Bill Condon
Starring Sir Ian McKellen, Laura Linney, and Milo Parker

As I said before, I really wish more people saw this film, because it's such a treat. It gives a very intriguing new look on the character of Sherlock Holmes, who is played here wonderfully by Ian McKellen. A little slow paced, but there's plenty of drama and intrigue to keep the audience captivated. Not many people probably remember this film now because it's been almost a year, which is a shame because it's such a unique film, with a creative story and terrific performances.

6. Room
Directed by Lenny Abrahamson
Starring Brie Larson and Jacob Tremblay

An emotionally gripping film if I've ever seen one. Your heartstrings are 110% attached to the journey of Joy Newsome and her son Jack. That is of course in credit to the actors who portray them. Brie Larson more than deserved her Oscar. You are in Joy's corner right from the very beginning. Jacob Tremblay gives an amazing performance as Jack. This kid's got a bright future ahead of him. One movie and the world's already in love with him. Room leaves a deep impact on the viewer, that will stick with you long after the end credits roll.

5. The Hateful Eight
Directed by Quentin Tarantino
Starring Kurt Russell, Samuel L. Jackson, and Walton Goggins

Tarantino does it again, with a brilliant script, beautiful score, and stunning visuals. Many of his regular cast members along with some new ones form one fantastic ensemble. Walton Goggins plays a deliciously despicable, almost dorky sheriff that ends up being one of the film's highlights, and Samuel L. Jackson adds another fantastic character into his filmography. The story seems simple, but as the film goes on it gets deeper, as it's revealed things are not what they appear, and you're left bubbling with intrigue. The Hateful Eight is another wonderful addition into Quentin Tarantino's art house.

4. Inside Out
Directed by Pete Docter
Starring Amy Poehler, Phyllis Smith, and Mindy Kaling

Inside Out is Pixar at its best. Pete Docter gives the studio another amazing entry into their canon, with a film that is unique, clever and emotionally uplifting. It features one of the best voice casts ever assembled, led by the amazing Amy Poehler, and a bunch of unforgettable characters (Bing Bong…). Inside Out should go down in history as one of the best animated films of all time, and definitely one of Pixar's best films. It's an emotionally poignant film that I think can touch the hearts of all ages…at least that's what the voices in my head say.

3. The Revenant
Directed by Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu
Starring Leonardo DiCaprio, Tom Hardy, and Domhall Gleeson

Leo finally got an Oscar! For one of the best performances of his career no doubt. The Revenant is an intense journey, both for Hugh Glass (DiCaprio) and the viewer. Featuring some truly heart-pounding sequences and beautiful imagery, it's not a film for the faint of heart, but it's incredibly well made. Inarritu's work with the camera is as much a character in the film itself, much like it was in Birdman. Alongside Leo, Tom Hardy gives a great performance as the despicable John Fitzgerald. Seriously guys, The Revenant is so much more than terrifying bear attack scene. It's an edge-of-your-seat story of survival and revenge, and one of the must-see films from last year.


2. Star Wars: The Force Awakens
Directed by J.J. Abrams
Starring Harrison Ford, Daisy Ridley, and John Boyega

You shouldn't be surprised this ended up on the list. It was the biggest film of last year. From what I've come to learn in the months since I've seen it, The Force Awakens is probably not what everyone wanted in a new Star Wars film. Though for me, who wasn't a big fan of the franchise from the start, I thought it was practically perfect. It knows when to use the nostalgia of the older films, it knows when to let the new characters shine vs. the old ones, and the bottom line is it's pure fun. I think wether you love Star Wars or just love good movies, you can get caught up in the thrill that is Star Wars: The Force Awakens. It sets the franchise up for a beautiful future in a galaxy far, far away.

So what film did I love so much that it knocks Star Wars down to number two? What was my top film of 2015? Well I'll tell you. It's...

1. The Peanuts Movie

Directed by Steve Martino
Starring Noah Schnapp and Bill Melendez

In a time when big-screen adaptations of old cartoons often askew the source material with crude humor and pop culture references, The Peanuts Movie is arguably one of the most faithful film adaptations ever made. The animation is gorgeous, and spot-on. It's the old Peanuts comics strips brought to life. The voice cast, there's not a well recognized celebrity to be heard. It's all regular kids, who bring Charlie Brown (Schnapp) and his friends to life flawlessly. The humor is akin to classic Peanuts. The story of Charlie Brown's constant failed attempts to succeed, and win the admiration of his beloved Little Red-Haired Girl, is not something new. It's a story that has defined this character since his conception. But it's a perfect way to introduce this world to a new generation, and it can emotionally resonate with anyone.

There are times when we all feel like we just can't win. Failure has almost become our best friend. No matter what we do, our goals seem lightyears away. That's Charlie Brown's whole life, and no matter how many setbacks he faces, he just keeps trying. He doesn't give up. That is an incredibly important message to me that I think everyone needs to learn. Without spoiling too much, where Charlie Brown winds up at the end of the film, leaves a mark on the viewer with a mixture of hope, innocence, and self-worth.

I'm going to cut myself short because this is "Top Films of 2015" not "Peanuts Movie Review w/Top Films of 2015" but from the perspective of someone who partially grew up on Peanuts, The Peanuts Movie is a perfect adaptation. It's a brilliant, funny, heartwarming film, and it's my top film of 2015.


Runners Up In No Particular Order: Spotlight, Avengers: Age of Ultron, Sisters, Ted 2, The Martian...

….Now, to make sure this doesn't happen again next year. I'm going to start writing my "Top Films of 2016" right now.