Film Review - "The Wild Robot"

Lot of animated films about robots coming out lately...

The Wild Robot
Directed by Chris Sanders

Starring Lupita Nyong'o, Pedro Pascal, and Kit Connor

Based on the book by Peter Brown, The Wild Robot tells the story of a service robot, ROZZUM Unit #7134, or "Roz" for short (Nyong'o) who becomes stranded on an island devoid of humanity. Roz stumbles across the egg of an orphaned baby goose. The baby, a runt, hatches and imprints on the robot, seeing her as his mother. Roz is built to serve and assist, and makes it her mission to raise this goose, later named Brightbill (Connor) and teach him to survive in the wild.

That's the basis of this beautiful, deeply-layered film from Writer-Director Chris Sanders, who has previously brought us the likes of Lilo & Stitch and How To Train Your Dragon. There's so much to take away here, for both kids and adults. The Wild Robot is rich with themes of nature vs nurture, overcoming adversity, blood family, found family, parenting, community, and acceptance. It's a film that audiences are able to walk away with something new after every viewing. 

The film also has a lot of dark humor which I got a kick of, and apparently a lot of the young kids in my theater did too. It's nice to see animated films not play down to children. The film gives off vibes of a Don Bluth film or classic Disney works, which isn't surprising since Sanders got his start with the latter. The visuals and aesthetic can drum up memories of Bambi or The Fox & The Hound, and it's easy to draw comparisons to Wall-E or Big Hero Six. However The Wild Robot is so much more than that...like if 

Bambi and Wall-E had a baby, and that baby was raised by Baymax from Big Hero 6.

All that being said, the film has its own unique look and is absolutely gorgeous. The scenery and background almost look hand-painted. The way they play with colors and lighting is stunning. There is so much iconic imagery that made me go "I want to try and draw that shot." Roz's design is very sleek and simplistic, but how the lighting plays into her programming is what takes it to the next level. All the animals have a very classic "Dreamworks" look to them but their textures and movements make them deceptively look hand-drawn at times.

This is a very personal sidetone, but when the first trailer for this film dropped, I was very intrigued because it had no dialogue, and the idea of a mainstream animated film with minimal dialogue excited me. I should've realized that wasn't the case right away, because they list all the famous voice actors at the end of that exact trailer. As more marketing for the film came out, they naturally started to show the animal characters talking, which I have no problem with. That's a trait hundreds of animated films share, many of which I love. The idea of one that deviated from the norm just intrigued me. Hell, I think not having the animal characters talk was one of Pocahontas's greatest strengths.

Regardless, I think the way this film allows the animals to talk is very clever, and the film is all the better for the fact that they talk. Not an animal in the film, but Lupita Nyong'o is perfect as Roz, balancing the technological and the emotional aspects of the character. Pedro Pascal disappears into Fink and gives a very charming performance as only he can. Kit Connor is a real standout as Brightbill, capturing the true essence of a young man (or goose) going through growing pains. It's just as much his film as it is Nyong'o's/Roz's.

The supporting cast is delightful. Catherine O'Hara is per usual both sweet and sassy as a mother opossum, and her babies steal a lot of scenes. Matt Berry has some fun moments as a beaver named Paddler. Ving Rhames pops up for a brief but delightful scene as a falcon who helps teach Brightbill to fly (If I had a nickel for every time Ving Rhames showed up unexpectedly in a 2024 animated film...) Bill Nighy is recognizable but nonetheless iconic as Longneck, an elder goose. I won't spoil Mark Hamill's character as I was waiting the whole film for him to show up, but when he does...it's great.

Composer Kris Bowers knocks it out of the park with the score. The music is so powerful, and reminiscent of John Powell's work in How To Train Your Dragon. I want this film to be nominated (and maybe win) Best Animated Feature at the Oscars this year, but I hope Bowers gets recognized too. This is a score worthing buying on vinyl.

The Wild Robot may just be one of Dreamworks Animations' best films yet. It's familiar but so powerful, and beautiful. I highly recommend seeing this one on the big screen with your families. Audiences of all ages can walk out with a smile of this one. In a year where we've already had the emotional gut-punch of Inside Out 2, the delightful surprise of Transformers One, and now this, it looks like this could be the first year in a while where there is no clear animated frontrunner come awards season...and that excites me. 

Animation. Is. Cinema...

"Hercules" - Disney's Superman

A quick Google search just told me that I am far from the first person to talk about this, but I'm going to still go for it. Maybe I can add something new to the conversation, or at least reignite it.

Sometimes you really have to sit back and admire the pipeline of Disney Animation in the nineties. The studio went from a French fairy-tale (Beauty & The Beast), to an Arabian fairy-tale (Aladdin), to Shakespeare's Hamlet with talking lions (The Lion King), to a fictitious dramatization of American history (Pocahontas), to a family-friendly but somehow still-faithful adaptation of a Victor Hugo novel (The Hunchback of Notre Dame) and then...Hercules. What range.

What is Hercules? You're probably saying "Well obviously Chris, it's an adaptation of Greek mythology." and you would be right...in a way. As I learned long ago in my high school Mythology class, Disney's Hercules is an adaptation disconnected to its source material even more so then Hunchback...but maybe not as much as Pocahontas. Seriously there's "Pocahontas & John Smith are the same age and romantically involved" inaccurate, and then there's "Zeus is a loving and loyal father figure" inaccurate...also Hades wasn't evil, Hera wasn't Hercules's mother, Hera killed Meg and Hercules' children, Hercules was born a demigod first because Zeus slept with a mortal woman, there was no Phil, the protagonist's real name isn't even Hercules. It's Heracles, but I digress...

Alright so if Hercules isn't a Greek mythology film then what is it? Easy my friends. It's a superhero film.

Obviously the film is inarguably saturated with Greek mythology. I'm not trying to do this Disney-Adult version of gaslighting on you. But when you look at the story in its base form, Hercules has more align with a classic superhero origin story. Specifically one superhero origin story in particular.

That film being Richard Donner's 1978 film, Superman, starring the late Christopher Reeve. A film that has recently come back to the forefront of my mind, thanks to a recent screening of the documentary Super/Man: The Christopher Reeve Story I attended (Great film by the way. Reeve really was Superman. Bring tissues.) 

It's weird how the mind works sometimes. Listening to Christopher Reeve talk in the documentary, something inside me said "His voice has a similar cadence to Tate Donovan. I think if they ever did a biopic Tate Donovan might play a good Christopher Reeve." Then I remembered Tate Donovan voiced Hercules. As Kronk in The Emperor's New Groove would say "Oh yeah. It's all coming together..."

Hercules's story starts out almost identical to Superman's. He is the descendant of these beings from another world with godlike strength, and due to unfortunate circumstances, he is left alone as a baby on Earth, and lo and behold adopted by farmers.

When Hercules and Clark Kent both start to feel like outcasts due to their extraordinary abilities, they leave home searching answers. This leads Clark to the Fortress of Solitude, and for Hercules that is the Temple of Zeus. Whereas a projection of his late father Jor-El comes to Clark/Kal-El, a projection of Zeus comes to Hercules.

Both heroes start to gain fame and notoriety through public acts of heroism, and they're is a cynical, female love-interest there to witness it all (Megara for Hercules, Lois Lane for Superman). There's not much of a comparison between Lex Luthor and Hades (They do both have cartoonishly large maps of the worlds they wish to conquer though). If anything, I'd say Pain and Panic and Otis have more in common.

The true parallel comes in the final act(s). Megara lays dying as Hercules fights to save Olympus from Hades and The Titans. Lois Lane gets trapped in her car during an earthquake, as Superman works to prevent other natural disasters. Neither hero is able to save both the world and their love...or are they?

Both Hercules and Superman defy fate to save their loves. Hercules rescues Megara from the underworld, risking his own life. Superman goes against Jor-El's teachings, and uses his powers to turn back time and save Lois. This is a critical moment for both. Hercules learns that his heart, his humanity, is what makes him a true hero. Not his godlike powers. 

Conversely, Kal-El had been instructed by his father to only inspire humans, and not to interfere with them. He even says to his son that he will be like a light to them to show them the way, almost like a God. But when the woman he loves dies, Kal-El chooses humanity over divinity, and that is what makes him a true hero. And similar to how Kal-El continues to live among humans in the guise of Clark Kent, Hercules decides to remain on Earth with Megara, declaring it's where he belongs.

Maybe it's just a bizarre coincidence that Tate Donovan was cast as Hercules, and it wasn't because the directors were looking for a "Christopher Reeve-type" to voice the character. Maybe I'm the only one who hears the similarities in the two actors' voices. But it got me here. Down this rabbit hole. A place where many others have been before. The place where we all know Hercules is Disney's Superman.

...Maybe I should do those Top Films of 2022 & 2023 now...or just go to bed...

Film Review - "Transformers One"

If I had a nickel for every time a prequel to a long defunct franchise, which I cared very little for, ended up being the best film in the series, I'd have two nickels. Which isn't a lot, but it's weird that it happened twice, right?

Transformers One

Directed by Josh Cooley

Starring Chris Hemsworth, Brian Tyree Henry, and Scarlett Johnansson

To be clear, I haven't seen anything that says One is canon to Michael Bay's series of big-blow up Transformers films but hey, why not make the Phineas & Ferb, two-nickels joke when you can?

Transformers One takes us back to the planet of Cybertron, long before Optimus Prime became Optimus Prime, and Megatron became Megatron. Here they are buddies Orion Pax (Hemsworth) and D-16 (Henry),  who work in the Energon mines of the city of Iacon (All these names sound silly to me but I'm sure they're business as usual for you diehard fans). Pax is a rebellious, free-spirit with big dreams for himself and his home planet, while D-16 is more uptight and by-the-book.

One day the two friends come across a lost distress signal from The Primes, the long-lost Defenders of Cybertron. Together they, along with fellow miners Elita-1 (Johansson) and B-127/Bumblee (Keegan-Michael Key) go on a mission to the uncharted surface of the planet, uncovering information that will shape their future and change Cybertron forever.

This is a well-made prequel. The story beats may seem familiar but there's so much that makes this film *sigh* more than meets the eye (The first of two times I will make that joke). First of all, the relationship between Orion and D is incredibly fleshed out. Their best friends-from-work-turned brothers relationship is the core of the film and it might not have worked if the script didn't give it the proper attention. Hemsworth and Henry also have great chemistry and completely...(I am so sorry)...transform into their respective roles.

I never knew that Transformers had so much lore, and I understand that it all sounds like very silly, almost cliche', science-fiction to the uninitiated. It did to me writing just the first few paragraphs of this review, and I've already watched the film. But One does a great job of initiating new fans into this world while also giving longtime fans plenty to enjoy. Never does the script get lost in exposition. It's short, simple, and sweet...as is the whole film, which barely clocks in under two hours.

The animation is very sleek and eye-catching. The environments aren't groundbreaking but they're perfect for a Transformers film. The world the animators built just works. Additionally, the lighting in some particular shots is very impressive. However, what really stands out is the animation of the characters, or I'll say the main characters. They're so colorful and vibrant. They look like robots but their faces are so expressive and human. These are qualities I feel like get lost in the translation to live action in the other films. A lot of the background characters and extras just fall into "generic robot" category.

(Author's Note: I feel like there were some Easter Egg appearances of other Transformer characters I didn't pick up on, because I know next to nothing about this franchise. But there were some shots that felt like "Yeah...thats somebody noteworthy.")

The voice cast is superb, many who are no strangers to animation. Hemsworth does great at making Orion Pax his own without impersonating Peter Cullen. It is very much Hemsworth's voice that you will hear but  there's a lot of passion and energy in his performance. The same goes for Brian Tyree Henry as D-16. Henry has that natural "big bro" voice and cadence about him, but he seamlessly juggles his performance between the light and the dark, as D-16 goes down a sinister path. Keegan-Micheal Key is delightful as Bumblee. He doesn't go over the top with his comedy, although some jokes run on too long. Scarlett Johansson is sweet and sassy as Elita-1, and has natural chemistry with her fellow Marvel alumnus Chris Hemsworth. Jon Hamm is a standout as Sentinel Prime, and Laurence Fishburne is giving his best Lauren Fishburne as Alpha Trion.

Last thing I want to say is that film has guts. What do I mean by that? It has the guts to go dark, to not undercut serious moments with jokes, and to stay unapologetically true to its source material. These are things I just feel like we don't see much of in film adaptations of popular franchises, or animated films in general.

Transformers One did something I never thought possible. It got me to care about Transformers. This is a well-crafted, well-acted, well-animated prequel, that fans old and new can enjoy. I know a lot of people love to see life-size Transformers fight it out and destroy Chicago or whatever city the Bay films take place in, and I'm sure there are many people that would dismiss this film as inferior to them because it's animated. Regardless of the medium, what One does that sets it above those other films is that it puts. Story. First. At the heart of this film is a story of two friends, brothers, fated to become enemies.

Yeah on the surface, it's a film about alien robots that can become muscle cars, but trust me...it's more than meets the eye. Publish Review.